Re: Common Business Objects

["Paul R. Levine" <plevine@telcordia.com>]

Duane,

You're right!  I was just supporting the reference to CBO in RegRep Part 1 Spec.

Paul




Duane Nickull <duane@xmlglobal.com> on 09/12/2000 01:56:24 PM

To:
cc:   ebxml-stc <ebxml-stc@lists.ebxml.org> (bcc: Paul R. Levine/Telcordia)
Subject:  Re: Common Business Objects






"Paul R. Levine" wrote:
... An ebXML Repository that will accommodate UML BPMs must necessarily
> accommodate CBOs as well as CCs that relate to the CBOs.
>>>>>>>>>>

This isn;t necessarily true Paul.  These can be kept in different
locations.  The methodology for locating a Registry/Repository has to be
consistent.  One single repository won't scale.

We have specified in the TA Spec (should be to the STC tomorrow), that
the four main doc types - TPA, BPM, CBO and CC, that are kept in
Repositories and indexed by Registries, may be kept in distributed
locations.  It is conceivable that each of those MAY reside in a
different location.  They also MAY reside in the same location.

Just a small point to clarify.

Duane Nickull