RE: I think we should use the gci proposal for the poc effortintokyo.... why?

[Rik Drummond <rvd2@worldnet.att.net>]

answer to your last question... press releases...... an it is great about
the ASN extensions!!! way to go!  rik

-----Original Message-----
From: Lisa M. Shreve [mailto:lms@wwnet.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 9:52 AM
To: sutor@us.ibm.com
Cc: Ebxml-Stc
Subject: Re: I think we should use the gci proposal for the poc effort
intokyo.... why?


Rik & Bob,

> I agree with this. It's a good way to strengthen the relationship and show
> the relevance of the work we are doing.

I fully agree that for political reasons alone, that we use PoC as a means
to
cement our relationship.  However, we would certainly be undermining our
technical project teams if we did not clearly understand what aspects of
ebXML
are demonstrated by the work of GCI.  I believe that that is the work of the
PoC team.  If I were asked if the GCI work constituted PoC for Core
Components,
I would certainly have to say absolutly not.

However, I am please to report that I have had a very positive email
exchange
with one of their team members, a long standing member of Core Components.
We
are discussing working next week on retail extensions to an Ship Notice.
This
would be a very powerful PoC for CC.

> .     - They have been a better partner, as an organization, from
visibility
>         and public support than any other so far

I'd be curious to learn what metric was used make this determination.

cheers,

lms