Re: CC Specifications submission

[Klaus-Dieter Naujok <knaujok@home.com>]

On Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:05:41 +0800, Tim McGrath wrote:

>However, our recommendation is that these
>documents go forward for public review, but only after a significant amount of editorial
>improvements are made.  This recommendation has only been made to minimise delays in the
>review process.

Tim,

Can you identify the time required to do those editorial
improvements?  As you are aware there is no real slag in the
schedule other than the second editorial cycle that is two weeks
instead of one due to Easter being in the middle. In order for the
executives to be aware of the impact I need some estimate your
delay may cause.

Thanks in advance for your quick response.

Klaus

--
Klaus-Dieter Naujok                          ebXML & TMWG Chair
Netfish Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, Chief Technology Officer