[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: updated requirements specification
>As far as "transaction" goes, my personal intent is to use it only in a >colloquial sense, not in a formal sense, especially since BP seems to use >the word "commercial transaction" to mean one exchange of messages, which >often does not correspond to a unit of business. If we can find a >colloquial word to use the way that "transaction" is used in the latest >requirements spec, let's put that on the list of things to change after >Tokyo. A business transaction would be defined in terms of the economic elements in the BP metamodel: that is, a business transaction is a full resource exchange between trading partners, for example, delivery of goods and payment, or, order-fulfillment-payment. The business transaction is not complete until both partners fulfill their explicit and implied commitments. Commercial transactions would be used for the document exchanges that documented the business transaction. Regards, Bob Haugen
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC