Subject: RE: initial draft of CPP-CPA Specification
Marty here are my comments to your comments...Thanks a lot for and best regard /Stefano Line 83: I agree with your note. Line 88: I agree (I think that in my comment I meant CPP instead that CollaborationProtocol... apologies) Line 100: Yes I am meaning "interacting". But the goal of this comment is to "introduce the idea of the CPA serving as a configuration tool". Line 119: I agree. I just wanted to say that if TPP is used, it should be put as a background... Line 334: are you meaning that, in your wording, "business application functions" is the merge of the ebXML-middleware (which is aware of the collaboration) and of the actual back-end systems (the legacy applications currently used by the customer) ? If this is true, I have the following comments: "The Collaboration-Protocol layer is the interface between the CPA-defined business transactions and the business-application functions that actually perform the business transactions" The "business transactions" are actually performed by the legacy applications, aren't they? The "CPA-defined business transactions" are the choreography of the actual business transactions that are executed by the legacy, am I wrong? So, I interpreted the "Collaboration-Protocol layer" as the layer which is in charge of "instructing" the legacy about which business transaction should be executed. In my interpretation, this layer is dinstinct from the legacy. Line 542: Ok. I would have preferred "..is THE combination of A TLayer ...", but I do not have any objection to "...is A combination of A TLayer..." Line 542 and 543: I agree with you, but I posted the comment since communication addresses and security are immediately mentioned at line 549 as a way to differentiate delivery channels. Line 650 to 660. I am not convinced on the second comment on multipurpose. I think that the "allPurpose" is different that "request + response". I think that an example would make it clearer. » -----Original Message----- » From: Martin W Sachs [mailto:mwsachs@us.ibm.com] » Sent: 19 January 2001 23:16 » To: Stefano POGLIANI » Cc: ebxml-tp@lists.ebxml.org; ebxml-ta-security@lists.ebxml.org » Subject: RE: initial draft of CPP-CPA Specification » » » » » Stefano, » » Thank you very much for your comment set. If I do not reply to a » particular comment, it means that I agree. Responses are embedded in this » copy of your comment set. » » My replies are embedded in the attached copy of your comments. » » To all: most comments that you supplied so far will be processed AFTER I » complete and distribute the initial draft of the CPA chapter. » » Regards, » Marty » » » (See attached file: response-stefano.html) » » ****************************************************************** » ******************* » » Martin W. Sachs » IBM T. J. Watson Research Center » P. O. B. 704 » Yorktown Hts, NY 10598 » 914-784-7287; IBM tie line 863-7287 » Notes address: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM » Internet address: mwsachs @ us.ibm.com » ****************************************************************** » ******************* » » » » Stefano POGLIANI <stefano.pogliani@sun.com> on 01/17/2001 09:37:58 AM » » To: ebxml-tp@lists.ebxml.org, ebxml-ta-security@lists.ebxml.org » cc: » Subject: RE: initial draft of CPP-CPA Specification » » » » Please disregard the previous mail since the attachment was poorly » formatted! » ================================================================== » ========== » » == » Attached you will find my comments on the document. » Please do not hesitate to contact me for clarifications on my comments. » » Best regards and congratulations for the excellent job! » » /Stefano » » » -----Original Message----- » » From: Martin W Sachs [mailto:mwsachs@us.ibm.com] » » Sent: 15 January 2001 23:11 » » To: ebxml-tp@lists.ebxml.org; ebxml-ta-security@lists.ebxml.org » » Subject: initial draft of CPP-CPA Specification » » » » » » I have attached the initial version of the CPP-CPA specification. As » » previously indicated to the TP team, this copy has the CPP chapter but » not » » the CPA chapter. Please review the CPP chapter while I am » completing the » » CPA chapter. Please post comments and be prepared to discuss at » » Wednesday's conference call. » » » » Regards, » » Marty » » » » (See attached file: cpa-cpp-spec-0.1-interim.pdf) » » » » ****************************************************************** » » ******************* » » » » Martin W. Sachs » » IBM T. J. Watson Research Center » » P. O. B. 704 » » Yorktown Hts, NY 10598 » » 914-784-7287; IBM tie line 863-7287 » » Notes address: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM » » Internet address: mwsachs @ us.ibm.com » » ****************************************************************** » » ******************* » » » » » »
Powered by
eList eXpress LLC