RE: ebXML pitch at XML One in London

[Ravi Kacker <rkacker@exceloncorp.com>]

Could someone send me the Presentation proposed by John Ibbotson..... I will
appreciate it.
Thanks.

Ravi Kacker
eXcelon Corporation
781-674-5000
rkacker@exceloncorp.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefano POGLIANI [mailto:stefano.pogliani@sun.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 8:42 AM
> To: john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com; ebxml-tp@lists.ebxml.org
> Subject: RE: ebXML pitch at XML One in London
>
>
> John,
>
> 	I like very much the presentation. I think, though, that it stays in
> between the things the ebXML/TPA part specifies and what is in
> the IBM BPF.
> So, even if personally I agree with the vast majority of the ideas you
> expressed here, I think that it should be more clearly identified
> what is in
> the scope of ebXML and what constitues the internal research from
> IBM (which
> led to TPA).
>
> Also, something on the automatic negotiation is mentioned which I do not
> remember to have seen anywhere else in ebXML (perhaps I am wrong).
>
> Below I detail my comments. Best regards
>
> /Stefano
>
> - Slide N. 8:
> 	- Fourth bullet : "Generate TPA code".
> 	  This is not clear, IMO. I would say "Generate code to
> manage the TPA"
> - Slide N. 9
> 	Personally I agree with it 200%.
> 	But I do not think that it is in the scope of the
> ebXML/TPA. I guess it is
> in
> 	the scope of IBM BPF.
> - Slide 12.
> 	- Second sub-bullet of second bullet.
> 	  What do you mean by "No business information" ?
> 	- Third sub-bullet of second bullet
> 	  What do you mean by "No business semantics except.."
> 	  I think you mean that there is no reference to the internal
> applications...
> - Slide 17 and 18 and 22
> 	Either mention that the content reflects a given version of
> the specs or
> 	mention that these are samples of a work-in-progress.
> - slide 28, 29, 30 and 31.
> 	Personally I agree very much...
> 	...but I do not think that they are in the scope of the
> ebXML/TPA. I guess
> 	they are in the scope of IBM BPF.
> - slide 33.
> 	It should be mentioned more clearly that this is something
> that will happen
> in
> 	the future and today ebXML does not prescribe anything on this
>
>
>
>
> » -----Original Message-----
> » From: john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com [mailto:john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com]
> » Sent: 23 January 2001 18:21
> » To: ebxml-tp@lists.ebxml.org
> » Subject: ebXML pitch at XML One in London
> »
> »
> »
> »
> »
> » Hi all,
> » There is an ebXML track at the XML One London conference in March. I've
> » been volunteered to give the TP pitch. Since I'm speaking on
> behalf of the
> » TP WG, I'd like to get your feedback on the presentation before it is
> » finalised. I guess there will be a lot of changes during the
> » Vancouver week
> » so I will spend some time with you to make sure that the
> finished product
> » reflects the latest position. Please take some time to look at
> » the attached
> » and send me any changes and suggestions you think should be included.
> » (See attached file: ebXML TPAs.ppt)
> » Thanks,
> » John
> »
> » XML Technology and Messaging,
> » IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park,
> » Winchester, SO21 2JN
> »
> » Tel: (work) +44 (0)1962 815188        (home) +44 (0)1722 781271
> » Fax: +44 (0)1962 816898
> » Notes Id: John Ibbotson/UK/IBM
> » email: john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
> »
>
>