RE: [PartyId "type" negotiation]

[Devendra Tripathi <tripathi@vidyaweb.com>]

I think DUNS/HIN could be just thought of as an extension to ID so there
may not be any need to negotiate it.

Regards,

Devendra Tripathi
VidyaWeb, Inc
90 Great Oaks Blvd #206
San Jose, Ca 95119
Tel: (408)226-6800,
Direct: (408)363-2375
Fax: (408)226-6862

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Prasad Yendluri [mailto:pyendluri@webmethods.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 6:40 PM
> To: William J. Kammerer
> Cc: ebxml-tp@lists.ebxml.org
> Subject: Re: [PartyId "type" negotiation]
>
>
>
>
> "William J. Kammerer" wrote:
>
> > Prasad Yendluri asked "Since PartyId can take a flexible form coupled
> > with the type attribute (e.g. <PartyId type="urn:duns.com">
> > 1234567890123 </PartyId>), has any thought been given to making this
> > negotiable / something that can be specified in the CPP/CPA?"
> >
> > Like a person might have certain names or nicknames he'll respond to, an
> > organization may use one or more logical identifiers to identify
> > itself - e.g., any of a D-U-N-S, a UCC/EAN GLN, a SCAC, a Health
> > Industry Number (HIN), and on and on.  Each of these is unique within
> > its name space (though an organization, through mergers or otherwise,
> > may have two or more of each!).
> >
> > As long as any of the valid IDs to which one will answer can be
> > accommodated in multiple occurrences of the <PartyId> element within
> > <PartyInfo> in the CPP,  what kind of negotiation would be necessary?
>
> The negotiation is on the "type". Should both parties use DUNS/HIN/..  Or
> perhaps one party could use DUNS and the other a URI for the SMTP address
> etc.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> "unsubscribe" in the body to: ebxml-tp-request@lists.ebxml.org
>