[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [Fwd: RE: on the issue of PartyId]
Message text written by Scott Hinkelman/Austin/IBM > I think this is simple and supports flexibility, I don't think we need to impose some type of registry. <<<<<<<<<<< Dave, you really are looking for things to argue about, huh?!!!? Did we not go all around this several weeks ago? I'm hearing overtones of that - and the outcome was that people think of this 'registry' as some behemoth - where in reality it could be as simple as a XML file in a sub-directory off a web server somewhere. So let's not revisit on that! The current WebDav DASL work I've been doing certainly allows for that minimalist approach, and RegRep as a whole is aware of the issues here. Notice what Scott was advocating - use the URI and no TYPE as the default - means you don;t even need the registry - but if you deviate from the path - then you need to tell your TP's and then it would not be unreasonable to insist this is done electronically via the registry. Thanks, DW.
Powered by eList eXpress LLC