Re: Explicit & Implicit acknowledgements

[Henry Lowe <hlowe@omg.org>]

Looks OK to me, though it would have been interesting to hear 
the discussion.

Comment: Perhaps there are a few too many flows internal to the 
MSH, but that's an implementation problem and of no concern here.

Henry
-------------------------
At 06:01 PM 09/28/2000 -0700, you wrote:
>Folks
>
>I attach a presentation that most of you in Dallas this week have seen all
>or part of. It describes how you can acknowledge receipt of messages
>"implicitly.
>
>I also think that, when using HTTP, we can always send back an explicit ack
>on the HTTP response and we don't need to do this with a separate HTTP post.
>
>
>So using the principle that we should not have two ways of doing something
>when one will do, I suggest that we adopt this approach unless someone can
>come up with reasons why it won't work.
>
>David
> <<Alternative protocol bindings.ppt>> 
>
>Product Management, CommerceOne
>4400 Rosewood Drive 3rd Fl, Bldg 4, Pleasanton, CA 94588, USA
>Tel: +1 (925) 520 4422 (also voicemail); Pager: +1 (888) 936 9599 
>mailto:david.burdett@commerceone.com; Web: http://www.commerceone.com
>
>