RE: Volunteers required for standards mapping

[Krishna Sankar <ksankar@cisco.com>]

Hi all,

	That would be a good idea - especially from the RosettaNet point of view,
which I am somewhat familiar with. In essence, we would compare the ebXML
information set (TRP+CPP+CPA) against the total RosettaNet InfoSet. I plan
to add the security aspects as well.

	cheers

-----Original Message-----
From: Stefano POGLIANI [mailto:stefano.pogliani@sun.com]
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 10:13 AM
To: ebXML Transport (E-mail)
Subject: RE: Volunteers required for standards mapping


I agree with Dale.
In other efforts the distinction we made between TR&P and TPA may not be
present, so we need to address the global space of TR&P and TPA, IMHO

/Stefano

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Moberg, Dale [mailto:Dale_Moberg@stercomm.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 3:29 PM
> To: 'Burdett, David'; ebXML Transport (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: Volunteers required for standards mapping
>
>
> David,
>
> I would hope that the standards comparison here could be
> made relevant to the CPP and CPA specification effort.
> We certainly want to be able to accomodate
> other standards within the CPP capabilities lists
> of the CPP.
>
> Dale Moberg
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Burdett, David [mailto:david.burdett@commerceone.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 9:26 PM
> > To: ebXML Transport (E-mail)
> > Subject: Volunteers required for standards mapping
> >
> >
> > In the conference call this morning it was agreed that it
> > would be a good
> > idea to start comparing the current version of the spec (0.8)
> > with other
> > similar standards to identify the "gaps". The initial
> > shortlist of standards
> > were:
> > *	BizTalk version 2.0
> > *	RosettaNet Implementation Framework (RNIF) version 2.0
> >
> > Do we need to compare any others?
> >
> > Comparison involves reviewing these standards headers and:
> > *	mapping the header elements to ebXML version 0.8
> > *	identifying data or elements that are missing and,
> > *	making a provisional recommendation on whether or not additional
> > data or changes should be made to ebXML
> >
> > Now for the hard part !!
> >
> > To do the comparison effectively needs someone who knows the
> > standard well.
> > I am volunteering to do BizTalk, so that means we need a
> > volunteer for RNIF
> > 2.0.
> >
> > If you think that some other standard needs to be compared
> > then please be
> > prepared to volunteer yourself to do the comparison or
> > volunteer someone
> > else ;)
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > David
> >
> > Product Management, CommerceOne
> > 4400 Rosewood Drive, Pleasanton, CA 94588, USA
> > Tel: +1 (925) 520 4422 (also voicemail); Pager: +1 (888) 936 9599
> > mailto:david.burdett@commerceone.com; Web: http://www.commerceone.com
> >
>