OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ebxml-transport message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: RE: Volunteers required for standards mapping


I agree with Dale.
In other efforts the distinction we made between TR&P and TPA may not be present, so we need to address the global space of TR&P and TPA, IMHO

/Stefano

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Moberg, Dale [mailto:Dale_Moberg@stercomm.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 3:29 PM
> To: 'Burdett, David'; ebXML Transport (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: Volunteers required for standards mapping
> 
> 
> David,
> 
> I would hope that the standards comparison here could be
> made relevant to the CPP and CPA specification effort.
> We certainly want to be able to accomodate 
> other standards within the CPP capabilities lists
> of the CPP.
> 
> Dale Moberg
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Burdett, David [mailto:david.burdett@commerceone.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 9:26 PM
> > To: ebXML Transport (E-mail)
> > Subject: Volunteers required for standards mapping
> > 
> > 
> > In the conference call this morning it was agreed that it 
> > would be a good
> > idea to start comparing the current version of the spec (0.8) 
> > with other
> > similar standards to identify the "gaps". The initial 
> > shortlist of standards
> > were:
> > *	BizTalk version 2.0
> > *	RosettaNet Implementation Framework (RNIF) version 2.0
> > 
> > Do we need to compare any others?
> > 
> > Comparison involves reviewing these standards headers and:
> > *	mapping the header elements to ebXML version 0.8
> > *	identifying data or elements that are missing and,
> > *	making a provisional recommendation on whether or not additional
> > data or changes should be made to ebXML
> > 
> > Now for the hard part !!
> > 
> > To do the comparison effectively needs someone who knows the 
> > standard well.
> > I am volunteering to do BizTalk, so that means we need a 
> > volunteer for RNIF
> > 2.0.
> > 
> > If you think that some other standard needs to be compared 
> > then please be
> > prepared to volunteer yourself to do the comparison or 
> > volunteer someone
> > else ;)  
> > 
> > Regards
> > 
> > David
> > 
> > Product Management, CommerceOne
> > 4400 Rosewood Drive, Pleasanton, CA 94588, USA
> > Tel: +1 (925) 520 4422 (also voicemail); Pager: +1 (888) 936 9599 
> > mailto:david.burdett@commerceone.com; Web: http://www.commerceone.com
> > 
> 



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Search: Match: Sort by:
Words: | Help


Powered by eList eXpress LLC