RE: Test Indicator Issue

["Miller, Robert (GXS)" <Robert.Miller@gxs.ge.com>]

Yes there are other ways to indicate a 'test' message, two of which are
referenced below.  But I contend that these other ways reduce the
parallelism of the test system to a greater extent than does a test flag.
Use of a test flag is a proven practice. So my advice is add the test flag -
"If it ain't broke, don't fix it!" 

Cheers,
       Bob Miller

-----Original Message-----
From: Nikola Stojanovic [mailto:nhomest1@twcny.rr.com]
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2000 8:57 AM
To: ebxml-transport@lists.ebxml.org
Subject: Re: First issue [was: Outstanding Issues - LONG please red to
end}


<Dick Brooks>
There are others means to indicate a "test" versus "production" message
exchange. For example:
- separate production and test ebxml handler URL's (mailboxes, FTP sites,
etc.)
- separate production and test Party ID's
</Dick Brooks>

Makes sense. I agree.

Nikola