RE: Test Indicator Issue

[Dick Brooks <dick@8760.com>]

Bob,

I don't understand how separate test/production URL's does the following:

> referenced below.  But I contend that these other ways reduce the
> parallelism of the test system to a greater extent than does a test flag.

Please explain. Thanks.


Dick Brooks
Group 8760
110 12th Street North
Birmingham, AL 35203
dick@8760.com
205-250-8053
Fax: 205-250-8057
http://www.8760.com/

InsideAgent - Empowering e-commerce solutions 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Miller, Robert (GXS) [mailto:Robert.Miller@gxs.ge.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 27, 2000 9:23 AM
> To: Nikola Stojanovic; ebxml-transport@lists.ebxml.org
> Subject: RE: Test Indicator Issue
> 
> 
> List-Unsubscribe:
>  <mailto:ebxml-transport-request@lists.ebxml.org?body=unsubscribe>
> List-Archive: <http://lists.ebxml.org/archives/ebxml-transport>
> List-Help: <http://lists.ebxml.org/doc/email-manage.html>,
>  <mailto:ebxml-transport-request@lists.ebxml.org?body=help>
> 
> Yes there are other ways to indicate a 'test' message, two of which are
> referenced below.  But I contend that these other ways reduce the
> parallelism of the test system to a greater extent than does a test flag.
> Use of a test flag is a proven practice. So my advice is add the 
> test flag -
> "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!" 
> 
> Cheers,
>        Bob Miller
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nikola Stojanovic [mailto:nhomest1@twcny.rr.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 27, 2000 8:57 AM
> To: ebxml-transport@lists.ebxml.org
> Subject: Re: First issue [was: Outstanding Issues - LONG please red to
> end}
> 
> 
> <Dick Brooks>
> There are others means to indicate a "test" versus "production" message
> exchange. For example:
> - separate production and test ebxml handler URL's (mailboxes, FTP sites,
> etc.)
> - separate production and test Party ID's
> </Dick Brooks>
> 
> Makes sense. I agree.
> 
> Nikola
>