Re: Naming Conventions [was: ebXML header extension mechanism proposal]

[Matthew MacKenzie <matt@xmlglobal.com>]

My $0.02:

XML           | UML/Java/C++/...     | Convention
--------------+----------------------+------------
Element names | Class/Interface      | Upper Camel
Attributes    | Properties/Attributes| Lower Camel


-Matt


On Fri, 1 Dec 2000, Farrukh Najmi wrote:

> I too support camel case. However, I am confused by specific focus on
> lowerCamelCase. I assume that in case of Schemas element names would use
> UpperCamelCase and attributes would use lowerCameCase.
> 
> In case of UML class diagrams classes and interfaces would use UpperCamelCase
> while methods and attributes would use lowerCameCase.
> 
> So I am in favour of camelCase use upper and lower according to rules described
> above.
> 
> --
> 
> Regards,
> Farrukh
> 
> christopher ferris wrote:
> 
> > Can't we get this issue raised/resolved earlier???
> > It has been on the table for months now and we're quickly
> > running out of time.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > Nikola Stojanovic wrote:
> > >
> > > <Chris>
> > > Agreed. I have (as has Nikola) been trying to lobby for lowerCamelCase since
> > > I cannot remember. I say we bite the bullet and make any change now.
> > > </Chris>
> > >
> > > TA is going to vote on this (Naming Conventions) in two weeks so you might
> > > want to wait til then.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Nikola
> 
> --
> Regards,
> Farrukh
> 
> 
>