RE: minutes 14-Dec-2000 TR&P con-call

[Doug Bunting <Doug@ariba.com>]

Unfortunately, I was not on the call for the first issue.  I can understand
a wish to avoid point-to-multipoint distribution of an ebXML payload as a
complicating issue.  However, what I was proposing in that comment was not
such a distribution model.  I was focussing on allowing the originator to
use multiple domains to identify the recipient.  This may be particularly
important in multi-hop cases, where the originator does not know how to
identify the end recipient to all intermediate MSHs.

Rather than add yet another requirement to the CPA, why not allow the
originator to identify the recipient in whatever ways they have available.
Each MSH could use its "favourite" domain from the provided list to
correctly forward the payload (either to the application context or another
MSH).

Can this issue be reopened?

thanx,
	doug

-----Original Message-----
From: christopher ferris [mailto:chris.ferris@east.sun.com]
Sent: December 14, 2000 09:11
To: ebxml-transport@lists.ebxml.org
Subject: minutes 14-Dec-2000 TR&P con-call

Attendees

Dick Brooks
David Burdett
Andrew Eisenberg
Doug Bunting
Chris Ferris
Ralph Berwanger
Prasad Yendluri
Robert Adams
Jerry ... AIAG (sorry, my system crashed with the original minutes...)
Dale Moberg
Maryann Hondo
Rik Drummond
Ian Jones (for less than a minute;-)

Minutes

Issue 10 - Multiple PartyId
Detail - 
7.9.1   - Recommend changing phrase PartyID element to 'one or more
PartyID
elements'.
discussion. unanimous opposition. There will be likely ramifications
with CPA which cannot be addressed. There are other ways of achieving
the same effect (such as mail aliases). 

Vote: not to accept

</ SNIP>