[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: CPA and overrides
As I recall the discussion of "override" from the telecon's of a couple of weeks ago, the concern was that an MSH not be able to change the delivery semantics that were specified in the CPA. For example, a UDP-based MSH could not accept a message intended for ReliableMessaging, but then silently use BestEffort. *IF* we put all the delivery semantics into the ebXML message header, then this question mostly goes away, because there is no CPA involved: it becomes a quality of implementation issue for how the business app tells its local MSH what semantics are required *by the business agreements.* Requiring an MSH to have to refer to a CPA is clearly a layering violation. /r$
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC