[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: CPA and overrides
I agree with Martha and Rich. Forcing a CPA/CPP module onto an MSH solution is an unnecessary burden on those needing simple, "direct" file transfer over a single transport, which is the majority of implementations in the Energy industry. The EDIINT AS2 specification made provisions for multiple transport options by adding a "receipt-delivery-option" header. This header contains a URI indicating the transport and delivery point (e.g. http://b2b.imacompany.com/cgi-bin/ebxmlhandler or mailto:ebxmlhandler@imacompany.com ) to send an asynchronous receipt (acknowledgement). CPA/CPP functionality is a nice feature for some, but it shouldn't be a requirement for ALL. If alternate delivery channels are needed for *acknowledgements* then I suggest a solution like that found in AS2. Dick Brooks http://www.8760.com/ -----Original Message----- From: rsalz@CaveoSystems.com [mailto:rsalz@CaveoSystems.com] Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 7:57 AM To: ebxml-transport@lists.ebxml.org; maw2@daimlerchrysler.com Subject: Re: CPA and overrides List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ebxml-transport-request@lists.ebxml.org?body=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.ebxml.org/archives/ebxml-transport> List-Help: <http://lists.ebxml.org/doc/email-manage.html>, <mailto:ebxml-transport-request@lists.ebxml.org?body=help> As I recall the discussion of "override" from the telecon's of a couple of weeks ago, the concern was that an MSH not be able to change the delivery semantics that were specified in the CPA. For example, a UDP-based MSH could not accept a message intended for ReliableMessaging, but then silently use BestEffort. *IF* we put all the delivery semantics into the ebXML message header, then this question mostly goes away, because there is no CPA involved: it becomes a quality of implementation issue for how the business app tells its local MSH what semantics are required *by the business agreements.* Requiring an MSH to have to refer to a CPA is clearly a layering violation. /r$ ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word "unsubscribe" in the body to: ebxml-transport-request@lists.ebxml.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC