[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: IETF draft on appropriate uses of HTTP
There is little connection between the subject line of this thread, which references Keith's -00 draft (and a multi-year discussion within the IAB on "fog" (damage to the stateless end-2-end catanet model) introduced by network address translators and firewalls, and the (argued) position within the IETF Applications Directorate that http is NOT good-for-everything (tm) simply because it has the (temporary) property of being generally permitted by NAT/Firewall operators, and any number of discussions (technical merits, non-technical merits, etc.) on SOAP, or XML, or any *ML for that matter. I suggest this list's members use appropriate threading: 1. on the W3C landing of a member submission, the cannonical W3C-ish members-only and/or public discussion, 2. on the functional specificiation mapping between SOAP-CURRENT and ebXML-CURRENT, 3. on Keith's -00 draft, Oblig technical comment on the original rational for forwarding Simon St.Laurent's mail (Henry Lowe): Q: "I think it supports the case for the use of MIME for ebXML as the TPR WG is doing." A: Yes. Eric Brunner brunner@engage.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC