Re: ebXML TA: removing Section 9.0, Open-edi

[Christopher Ferris <chris.ferris@east.sun.com>]

I should think that it could be removed altogether. What is
is section 10 and 11 is good enough to set the background for
what BOV and FSV are.

I say drop it, concurring with Scott, Nikola and others.

Chris

Brian Eisenberg wrote:
> 
> Ok folks - we've decided to pare down this section a bit. Stay tuned for the
> updated version.
> 
> --Brian
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nikola Stojanovic [mailto:nhomest1@twcny.rr.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 3:14 PM
> To: Scott Hinkelman/Austin/IBM; Jeff Suttor
> Cc: ebxml-architecture@lists.ebxml.org
> Subject: Re: ebXML TA: removing Section 9.0, Open-edi
> 
> <Scott>
> There is no question that section 9 can easily give the impression that
> ebXML is significantly tied to EDI, which could easily increase the buy-in
> barrier and result in limited success.
> 
> If we had to vote, I say remove it.
> If we have to compromise, reference it in one short paragraph and move on.
> 
> >Remember that ebXML is designed to reach the SMEs that EDI wasn't
> appropriate for.
> 
> Well put.
> </Scott>
> 
> I support the same (Scott's) view.
> 
> Regards,
> Nikola

-- 
    _/_/_/_/ _/    _/ _/    _/ Christopher Ferris - Enterprise Architect
   _/       _/    _/ _/_/  _/  Phone: 781-442-3063 or x23063
  _/_/_/_/ _/    _/ _/ _/ _/   Email: chris.ferris@East.Sun.COM
       _/ _/    _/ _/  _/_/    Sun Microsystems,  Mailstop: UBUR03-313
_/_/_/_/  _/_/_/  _/    _/     1 Network Drive Burlington, MA 01803-0903