[Fwd: Tr: ebXML glossary]

[Tim McGrath <tmcgrath@tedis.com.au>]

for discussion at today's meeting...


--
regards
tim mcgrath
TEDIS   fremantle  western australia 6160
phone: +618 93352228  fax: +618 93352142

---

• From: "agrangard@nycall.com" <anders.grangard@edifrance.org>
• To: ebXML-Architecture List <ebxml-architecture@lists.ebxml.org>
• Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 15:29:43 +0200

It seems that neither I nor Collin have received any comments from the
TechArch on the glossary which was distributed last Friday. If I do not hear
any major concerns today, I will distributed it to the steering committee
tomorrow morning for information/comments. I do not view the document as a
specification at this point and will consequently not request a QR.

Regards
Anders

----- Original Message -----
From: Colin Barham <Colin.Barham@tie.nl>
To: 'agrangard@nycall.com' <anders.grangard@edifrance.org>
Cc: <BrianE@DataChannel.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 6:18 PM
Subject: RE: ebXML glossary


> Anders
> I haven't received any comments from our list yet on the glossary
> content. Seeing as no-one has commented on it in our group we could
perhaps
> send it to a wider audience. You may wish to ask this of the whole TA
group
> though. The procedure for this commenting was stated in the mail the
> glossary was attached to. Again since no comment has been made around this
I
> am assuming this procedure to be ok.
> If you wish I can change the spreadsheet format and send out a word
> doc instead. I also still haven't received the definitions on some of the
> registry terms from Brian who was in contact with David Webber about
these.
> I'll Cc him this mail this evening for these and update the glossary when
I
> receive them.
>
> Colin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: agrangard@nycall.com [mailto:anders.grangard@edifrance.org]
> Sent: dinsdag 24 oktober 2000 17:32
> To: Eisenberg, Brian; Barham, Colin
> Subject: Tr: ebXML glossary
>
>
> Brian and Collin,
>
> More and more people are understandably asking for the glossary. Before I
> distribute it to the SC I want to touch base with you. Is it stable enough
> to circulate outside the TA team?
>
> Anders
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM <mwsachs@us.ibm.com>
> To: <anders.grangard@edifrance.org>
> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 5:14 PM
> Subject: ebXML glossary
>
>
> > Several people have mentioned that there is an ebXML glossary which they
> > believe is handled by the TA team.  Such a document would be important
in
> > resolving terminology discussions that are getting in the way of forward
> > motion of the TP team.
> >
> > Are you aware of a glossary?  Is it sufficiently stable to be able to be
> > used by other teams?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Martin Sachs
> >
> >
>
****************************************************************************
> *********
> >
> > Martin W. Sachs
> > IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
> > P. O. B. 704
> > Yorktown Hts, NY 10598
> > 914-784-7287;  IBM tie line 863-7287
> > Notes address:  Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
> > Internet address:  mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
> >
>
****************************************************************************
> *********
> >

---

begin:vcard 
n:McGrath;Tim
tel;pager:+61(0)299633829
tel;cell:+61 (0)438352228
tel;fax:+61(0)893352142
tel;work:+61(0)893352228
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:tmcgrath@tedis.com.au 
x-mozilla-cpt:;-19376
fn:tim mcgrath
end:vcard