Re: Issues with ebXML Glossary

[Tim McGrath <tmcgrath@tedis.com.au>]

The Quality Review Team wish  to bring to the attention of the Executive
a decision by the TA Team not to submit the ebXML Glossary for a Quality
Review.

The statement below comes from their list server....

Subject: 
       Tr: ebXML glossary
   Date: 
       Thu, 26 Oct 2000 15:29:43 +0200
   From: 
       "agrangard@nycall.com" 
    To: 
       ebXML-Architecture List <ebxml-architecture@lists.ebxml.org>

> It seems that neither I nor Collin have received any comments from the
> TechArch on the glossary which was distributed last Friday. If I do not hear
> any major concerns today, I will distributed it to the steering committee
> tomorrow morning for information/comments. I do not view the document as a
> specification at this point and will consequently not request a QR.

>

We understood our terms of reference covered 'ebXML deliverables with a technical content' and not just 'specifications'.  The ebXML Glossary is a key reference document spanning all ebXML projects and is critical to achieving consistency. As such we believe it should qualify for a Quality Review.

Can you advise?
 

>
regards
tim mcgrath
TEDIS   fremantle  western australia 6160
phone: +618 93352228  fax: +618 93352142
 
begin:vcard 
n:McGrath;Tim
tel;pager:+61(0)299633829
tel;cell:+61 (0)438352228
tel;fax:+61(0)893352142
tel;work:+61(0)893352228
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:tmcgrath@tedis.com.au 
x-mozilla-cpt:;-19376
fn:tim mcgrath
end:vcard