Re: ebXML core components diagrammed

[Philip Goatly <philip.goatly@bolero.net>]

Hello there,

   Please could you clarify for me whether this is the approved ebXML
diagrams or is it your supposition of these diagrams?

    That is to say what is the status and authority of these diagrams

Cheers, Phil

----- Original Message -----
From: <John.Motley@log-net.com>
To: "Mike Conroy" <michael.conroy@wanadoo.fr>
Cc: "ebXML Core" <ebxml-core@lists.ebxml.org>; <F.De_Vos@mail.eurofer.be>
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 3:41 PM
Subject: Re: ebXML core components diagrammed


>
>
>
> I understand you are trying to only provide an example but wanted to
> provide some technical feedback.  This looks more like a data model than a
> class diagram.  There are no methods and only attributes.  If it was
> intended as a data model, it should be normalized as it is currently in a
> highly inefficient normal form.
>
> Regards,
> John Motley
>
> LOG-NET, Inc.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Mike Conroy <michael.conroy@wanadoo.fr> on 03/06/2001 12:46:49 PM
>
> To:   ebXML Core <ebxml-core@lists.ebxml.org>
> cc:   F.De_Vos@mail.eurofer.be
>
> Subject:  ebXML core components diagrammed
>
>
> In order to try and understand how the core components were to be used, I
> attempted to make a class diagram of them, which you'll find in the
> enclosed
> PDF file. Whilst I was doing the diagram I saw two anomolies which still
> figure in the model they are:
>
> 1. UID 000080 should have I think a type of aggregate to be in line with
> the
> country in postal address and with the core component reused column.
> 2. UID 000081 should have a type of aggregate to be in line with the core
> component reused column.
>
> Before I make any other comments I'd apprecioate it of the core components
> designers could tell me if the model is correct or if its all wrong.
>
> If its wrong then I'd appreciate it if they would give me an indication on
> how to correct it.
>
> If its right then I'll have a certain number of comments to make.
>
> Regards
>
> Mike Conroy
> Sema
>
> (See attached file: component.PDF)
>
>
>