Re: autogeneration of UML to XML

[Philip Goatly <philip.goatly@bolero.net>]

Martin,

    Yes you have to have an XML 'mapping' of soem sort since XML where XML
is more restrictive than UML the UML
    cannot stray outside the limitations of the XML.

Cheers, Phil
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Conroy" <michael.conroy@wanadoo.fr>
To: "Martin Bryan" <mtbryan@sgml.u-net.com>; "ebXML Core"
<ebxml-core@lists.ebxml.org>
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 12:55 PM
Subject: Re: autogeneration of UML to XML


> Martin,
>
> Just a correction, its not a UML model of SOX, but rather a set of rules
to
> be followed in order to create a UML/XML mapping device. I think the it is
> likely the rules will allow for a W3C schema to be generated.
>
> The problem is that you're not getting a "neutral" UML model, but rather
an
> XML mapping.
>
> Regards
>
> Mike
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Martin Bryan" <mtbryan@sgml.u-net.com>
> To: "ebXML Core" <ebxml-core@lists.ebxml.org>
> Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 12:22 PM
> Subject: Re: autogeneration of UML to XML
>
>
> > > See UML for XML Schema Mapping Specification
> > > http://www.rational.com/uml/resources/documentation/index.jsp
> > > <http://www.rational.com/uml/resources/documentation/index.jsp>
> >
> > Note that this 1999 specification provides a UML model for CommerceOne's
> SOX
> > specification and not a mechanism for relating UML to W3C XML Schemas.
> >
> > Martin Bryan
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> > "unsubscribe" in the body to: ebxml-core-request@lists.ebxml.org
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> "unsubscribe" in the body to: ebxml-core-request@lists.ebxml.org
>