Dear Thomas, Is your concern with respect to your investment in BPSS that of a) you or your organization's time invested time the development BPSS related software? or b) you or your organization's time invested in the development of the BPSS specification? Sincerely, Brian S. Hayes > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Lee [mailto:ytlee@cecid.hku.hk] > Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 8:34 AM > To: ebxml-dev@lists.ebxml.org > Subject: Re: [??] Highlights of the changes between BPSS 1.01 and 1.1 > > > Dear Klaus, > > I thought UN/CEFACT planned to start a new initiative called Business > Collaboration Specification Schema as you mentioned in the UN/CEFACT > Asia tour (see > http://www.unbcf.org/PDF/BCF-workshop-session4-klaus.pdf). > > Dear all, > > It seems unclear UN/CEFACT or OASIS or both will continue the > development of BPSS. To my knowledge, many Asian > organizations and firms > including my organization have invested considerable resource in > implementing BPSS. Many of us would be very grateful to see > BPSS isn't > dead and a 'stable' technical team would take up the BPSS > development so > that our investment would not be wasted. > > Regards, > Thomas > > Klaus-Dieter Naujok wrote: >
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>