RE: POC Document-Matrix

[Nicholas Kassem <nick.kassem@eng.sun.com>]

I sent the POC proposal to the stc earlier today. We should fold all 
changes/enhancements etc. into the proposal and perhaps after the f2f next 
week we can send a more polished version of the document to the stc.

nick

At 09:11 AM 10/11/2000 -0700, Krishna Sankar wrote:
>Hi,
>
>         Here is the current participant matrix. I did not want to send 
> out the
>whole document and I am sure the matrix could change a little bit.
>
>         Nick, can you pl include this as an addendum to the steering 
> committee ? I
>will update the original document. Thanks
>
>         cheers
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: JP Morgenthal [mailto:jp.morgenthal@xmls.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 7:20 AM
>To: 'Krishna Sankar'
>Subject: RE: POC Document
>
>
>Krishna,
>
>The participation matrix still does not list XMLS as a Reg/Rep provider.
>This is the majority of functionality we intend to provide.  Can we get this
>corrected before sending to the stc?
>
>JP
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Krishna Sankar [mailto:ksankar@cisco.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 11:47 PM
>To: ebxml-Poc (E-mail)
>Subject: POC Document
>
>
>Hi all,
>
>         Here is the POC document which will be forwarded to the stc. This is
>essentially the same contents as the earlier version except a few changes on
>the capability and participant matrix.
>
>         We have added the reliable messaging on both diagrams. The
>participants in
>the matrix has changed a little bit based on feedback. We also added a few
>sentences around track 1 to make a few points more clearer.
>
>         cheers
>