RE: Registry Headers

[Nicholas Kassem <Nick.Kassem@eng.sun.com>]

Mark/JP,

I stand corrected. The RR spec is explicit about the values 
of  <ServiceInterface> & <Action>. See Farrukh's e-mail.

Nick

At 01:41 PM 10/30/2000 -0800, Mark Hale wrote:
>I agree with using QueryManager for the Service Interface.  I think that we
>should uniquely bind the Actions.  Can we make the Action equal to the Root
>Node of the Payload (e.g. GetRootClassificationNodesRequest and
>GetRootClassificationNodesResponse, etc.) since there is some sematic
>meaning behind their naming?
>
>         Thanks,
>
>         Mark
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: JP Morgenthal [mailto:jp.morgenthal@xmls.com]
> > Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 1:14 PM
> > To: 'Nicholas Kassem'; ebxml-Poc (E-mail)
> > Subject: RE: Registry Headers
> >
> >
> > I like, but can we decide on this today because this impacts the
> > handling of
> > these messages.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > JP
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nicholas Kassem [mailto:Nick.Kassem@eng.sun.com]
> > Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 4:07 PM
> > To: hale@ajubasolutions.com
> > Cc: ebXML poc
> > Subject: RE: Registry Headers
> >
> >
> > Mark,
> >
> > Please see my comments.
> >
> > Nick
> >
> > At 03:48 PM 10/28/2000 -0700, Mark Hale wrote:
> > >With respect to the ebXML Headers required to interact with
> > RegRep, we need
> > >to finalize on the header info.  I think that the suggestion that I made
> > >earlier went on a long-winded tangent.  Please permit to back up
> > and see if
> > >we can reach consensus.
> > >
> > >Step 1:  The header looks the following where and we are trying to reach
> > >consensus on --A-- and --B--
> > >
> > >         <ebXMLHeader>
> > >           <Header>
> > >             <TPAInfo>
> > >               <TPAId context = "POC">
> > >                 CPA/CPAInfo/CPAName
> > >               </TPAId>
> > >               <ConversationId context = "POC
> > >                 uid@requester-domain [from request message]
> > >               </ConversationId>
> > >               <ServiceInterface>     --A--    </ServiceInterface>
> > >               <Action>  --B--      </Action>
> > >             </TPAInfo>
> > >           </Header>
> > >           ...
> > >         </ebXMLHeader>
> > >
> > >Step 2:  I propose the values of A & B should be:
> > >
> > >  --A-- == Object Query Manager
> > >   Note:  This is only one of several service interfaces
> > >  --B-- == GetRootClassificationNodesRequest
> > >   Note:  This is only one of several actions within the interface
> > >
> > >Step 3:  I suggested the locations of A & B in the cpp-cpa DTD in the
> > e-mail
> > >sent earlier.  Please do not use the locations in the header.  Rather I
> > >thought I would tell you exactly where you can find the values
> > of A & B in
> > >the DTD:
> > >
> > >--A-- ==
> > CPA/BusinessProtocol/BusinessInterface/ServiceInterface?InterfaceId
> >
> > Not sure this needs to be a distinguished name - why not simply:
> > QueryManager
> >
> > >--B-- ==
> > >CPA/BusinessProtocol/BusinessInterface/ServiceInterface/ActionMen
> > u/Action/R
> > e
> > >quest/RequestMessage
> >
> > Same as above - why not for example, simply use :
> > getRootClassificationNodes
> >
> > Nick