RE: Priorities for Vancouver POC

["Munter, Joel D" <joel.d.munter@intel.com>]

reply:

I strongly disagree. I believe that there are many issues yet to be dealt
with that are heavily dependent upon a well designed and specified security
model.  e.g., We have yet to address the security aspects of "distributed"
registry/repository.  Security must be specified and worked sooner rather
than later.  

In direct contrast, I believe that Ad Hoc query can easily be added later.

Joel


-----Original Message-----
From: Prasad Yendluri [mailto:pyendluri@webmethods.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 2:06 PM
To: ebxml-regrep@lists.ebxml.org
Subject: Re: Priorities for Vancouver POC


Farrukh,

IMHO security (authetication or authorization) is a well understood aspect
and will easily fall in place anytime.  Enriching the "registry"
capabilities should be a priority. Hence I would vote for ad hoc query
capability

Thanks, Prasad

Farrukh Najmi wrote:

> In today's POC con call today I was asked to gather input from the
> Registry team on our priorities for Registry functionality that should
> be implemented and shown for Vancouver. The one guideline we must bear
> in mind is that any functionality that we suggest for POC must be
> speced.
>
> According to our phased delivery plan developed at Tokyo, we have the
> following new functionality planned for our specs for Release 1
> (Vancouver time frame):
>
> -Registry security (authentication and authorization)
> -Ad hoc query capability
>
> Please share your sense of priorities for what Registry functionality
> should be implemented and shown for the Vancouver POC. Please indicate
> priority (1 being highre priority than 2).
>
> --
> Regards,
> Farrukh