[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Trading Partner Logical Identification based on EDIFA
Message text written by INTERNET:mwsachs@us.ibm.com > Question: Has anyone yet worried about the uniqueness of the TPA ID? To make routing work based on the TPA ID, the TPA has to be unique at least within the run-time that is being used by each partner. To avoid the need to require uniqueness across both partners, the TPA ID could have a separate subelement for each partner. Alternatively, it could be required that the TPA be stored in one registry that both partners accept. This would also guarantee a unique identifier. <<<<<<<<<<<< Marty - does IBM have an public algorithm for this? MQSeries seems like a good place to find such already... Unique session ID's is same deal. Again MIME may have something in tracking side of things it uses too. I've seen some pretty long "handle" strings in MIME headers... DW.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC