RE: Volunteers required for standards mapping

["Moberg, Dale" <Dale_Moberg@stercomm.com>]

David,

I would hope that the standards comparison here could be
made relevant to the CPP and CPA specification effort.
We certainly want to be able to accomodate 
other standards within the CPP capabilities lists
of the CPP.

Dale Moberg

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Burdett, David [mailto:david.burdett@commerceone.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 9:26 PM
> To: ebXML Transport (E-mail)
> Subject: Volunteers required for standards mapping
> 
> 
> In the conference call this morning it was agreed that it 
> would be a good
> idea to start comparing the current version of the spec (0.8) 
> with other
> similar standards to identify the "gaps". The initial 
> shortlist of standards
> were:
> *	BizTalk version 2.0
> *	RosettaNet Implementation Framework (RNIF) version 2.0
> 
> Do we need to compare any others?
> 
> Comparison involves reviewing these standards headers and:
> *	mapping the header elements to ebXML version 0.8
> *	identifying data or elements that are missing and,
> *	making a provisional recommendation on whether or not additional
> data or changes should be made to ebXML
> 
> Now for the hard part !!
> 
> To do the comparison effectively needs someone who knows the 
> standard well.
> I am volunteering to do BizTalk, so that means we need a 
> volunteer for RNIF
> 2.0.
> 
> If you think that some other standard needs to be compared 
> then please be
> prepared to volunteer yourself to do the comparison or 
> volunteer someone
> else ;)  
> 
> Regards
> 
> David
> 
> Product Management, CommerceOne
> 4400 Rosewood Drive, Pleasanton, CA 94588, USA
> Tel: +1 (925) 520 4422 (also voicemail); Pager: +1 (888) 936 9599 
> mailto:david.burdett@commerceone.com; Web: http://www.commerceone.com
>